Which statement is true regarding metadata updates?

The statement regarding metadata updates that is true is that metadata fields may be highlighted for user attention. Highlighting specific metadata fields helps users prioritize and focus on essential information related to the data set, enhancing the effectiveness and usability of the metadata. This practice aids in ensuring that users are aware of key attributes or changes that may affect their work and decision-making processes.

Highlighting metadata fields can also improve the data management process by guiding users in understanding the context, quality, and lineage of the data. This is particularly important when dealing with extensive datasets or when the metadata is complex, as it fosters better comprehension and utilization of the data.

Other statements may convey misconceptions about metadata. For instance, the idea that all metadata can be updated without limits does not hold true, as certain metadata fields are often governed by strict protocols or standards that dictate how they can be modified. Similarly, while metadata is crucial for effective data management, the notion that it is not necessary contradicts established best practices within GIS and data governance. Lastly, the assertion that all updates require schema changes overlooks the fact that many metadata updates can occur without altering the underlying data structure. Therefore, the highlighting of metadata fields stands out as a best practice that directly supports user engagement and data utilization.