Is it possible to use the same attribute domain for feature classes and nonspatial tables?

Using the same attribute domain for feature classes and nonspatial tables is indeed possible, and this aligns with the principles of maintaining data integrity and consistency within a GIS database. Attribute domains are defined within a Geodatabase and provide a way to enforce valid values for attributes, whether they belong to spatial features or nonspatial tables.

When the same domain is applied to both feature classes (which store geographic data) and nonspatial tables (which may contain related tabular data), it ensures that the values are consistent across different types of data. For example, if you have a domain that defines valid types of land use, you can apply this domain to both a feature class representing parcels of land and a nonspatial table holding information about land use assignments. This enhances the validation process and reduces the risk of errors that can occur if different values were allowed in different contexts.

Furthermore, being able to use the same domain across various data types supports the relational aspect of databases, making it easier to manage and retrieve consistent information. This is instrumental in robust GIS applications where data integration and integrity are crucial to analyses and decision-making processes. Thus, the ability to utilize the same attribute domain for both feature classes and nonspatial tables is a valuable feature in