For a small GIS company with five users, which type of geodatabase is best suited due to size and editing capabilities?

A file geodatabase is indeed the most suitable choice for a small GIS company with five users, especially considering the requirements for size and editing capabilities.

File geodatabases are designed to store data in a file system, accommodating larger datasets and allowing for multi-user editing. They typically support up to 1 TB of data and can handle various data types and advanced geospatial capabilities, making them a flexible option for many GIS applications. With five users, a file geodatabase allows simultaneous editing and access without the complexity and overhead associated with more extensive database management systems, such as enterprise geodatabases.

This option strikes a good balance between performance and usability for a small team, providing the necessary functionality without the constraints of size limitations seen in personal geodatabases, which are limited to 2 GB and designed for single-user environments. Unlike enterprise geodatabases, which are intended for larger organizations with complex requirements and centralized data management, a file geodatabase offers a simpler setup and easier management, which is ideal for a small company. A cloud geodatabase, while useful for certain applications, may introduce additional costs and require a stable internet connection, which may not be necessary for a small team working on localized projects.